Original Cannabis Dealers Raise $146,000 to Push for Permanent Adult Retail Licenses

Supporters of a proposition on the Nov. 3 ballot that would dramatically re-write West Hollywood’s cannabis retail license process have raised $145,628 to promote it.

According to campaign finance documents, MedMen, United Local 770, and Zen Healing are the primary backers of “West Hollywood Residents and Businesses for Fairness, a Coalition of Cannabis Businesses, UFCW Local 770, and Concerned Residents.” MedMen has contributed $90,000, the union has contributed $25,000, and another $25,000 has come from Alex Kardos, partner and founder of Where Eagles Fly LLC, which qualified for a cannabis consumption lounge license from the City of West Hollywood in 2018.

The ballot initiative was created by all four of the city’s original cannabis dispensaries – MedMen, Alternative Herbal Health Services, Los Angeles Patients and Caregivers Group, and Zen Healing Collective– collectively known as “The Originals.” These four shops have been selling medical marijuana for years and automatically received licenses to continue to sell medical marijuana under the city’s new cannabis regulations enacted after California legalized sale of recreational marijuana beginning in 2018.

These four Originals all applied for licenses to become “adult use retailers,” which sell recreational marijuana. However, all four were denied those adult use licenses after a committee determined eight other shops had better proposals. Eight is the maximum number of recreational or “adult use” cannabis shops the city will allow.

However, while those eight recreational marijuana shops that did receive approval were busy getting their business licenses and building their stores, the city has allowed the four Originals to temporarily sell recreational cannabis. Those temporary recreational licenses expire at the end of this year, at which time the Originals will be forced to resume selling only medical cannabis. The problem is, since legalization, people no longer need a doctor’s recommendation to purchase cannabis, so the medical cannabis business has essentially dried up. Only about three percent of all cannabis sales in the state are medical cannabis now.

The Originals lobbied the City Council to give them permanent licenses to sell recreational marijuana, but the Council refused. Consequently, the Originals circulated a petition to combine the medical marijuana and the “adult use” retailers license categories, thereby expanding the number of recreational shops from eight to 16 and, in the process, granting recreational licenses to the four Originals. Their petition also includes numerous other changes to the city’s regulations governing cannabis shops including combining consumption lounge categories and changing the rules regarding sale/transfer of licenses. Because the Originals received the required number of signatures on their petition, the City Council voted unanimously at its June 1 meeting to send it to the voters in the November election.

Another measure on the Nov. 3 ballot was created by Adult Use Retailers Association of West Hollywood (AURA), which represents the eight businesses that did receive approval to open recreational marijuana shops. It would keep the number of recreational marijuana shops in the city at eight, thereby leaving the city’s existing regulations governing cannabis shops in place, save for some minor alterations.

AURA began collecting signatures on its petition in mid-March when the coronavirus Safer at Home quarantine orders went into effect. Those orders made it almost impossible to gather enough signatures to qualify for the November election (20% of registered voters). For that reason AURA asked the City Council to back its initiative and place it on the ballot. Since this item keeps the city’s existing regulations largely intact, the City Council voted in June to put it on the ballot.

0 0 vote
Article Rating

9 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jason K
Jason K
3 months ago

They originals should be allowed to have a license regardless of the process. They came in and took the risk when you were only allowed to sell medical marijuana, and the risk of being shutdown by the government was much greater. Now just because the city wants the stores to look like the Barney’s or Neiman’s of pot they want to put the stores that have served the community for so many years out of business. If these stores are going to be so amazing let them drive the originals out of business based on competition. It’s clear why the… Read more »

Mary Jane
Mary Jane
3 months ago

All current legislation on the state level is by unanimous voter consent, any cannabis advocate not for the “re-write” measure is on on the wrong side of history and not recognizing the vehicle which is used to create as much of a comprehensive market place that is possible.

Vigilant
Vigilant
4 months ago

We will all eventually go up in a puff of smoke.

TomSmart
TomSmart
4 months ago

I’m voting YES. The process was rigged from the start and a developer crony of the council is part owner of Calma. Also, is the city really in the position to turn down added tax dollars right now?? So many businesses are abandoned and boarded up.

Josh Kurpies
Josh Kurpies
4 months ago
Reply to  TomSmart

Everything I’ve heard and read about the process indicates it was a thorough and fair process. Please don’t start this campaign off with unsupported allegations about the process being rigged. I’d much rather have a discussion about why these four deserve to have their licenses expanded; and what affects that may have on the the four businesses that invested their time and money into their applications and presentations that earned them a retail license in our City. Second, please expand on your thought process as to why having more cannabis retailers means more taxes and revenue for the City –… Read more »

TomSmart
TomSmart
4 months ago
Reply to  Josh Kurpies

The people shall decide.

JF1
JF1
4 months ago

The City created a fair process. The “originals” didn’t cut it. I’m voting NO on the prop supported by them that would re-write City policy.

Alan Strasburg
Alan Strasburg
4 months ago
Reply to  JF1

As much as I loathe validating anonymity in public commentary, you’re absolutely right. There was a process. Everyone knew the process going in. It’s a hard no vote for me.

Last edited 4 months ago by Alan Strasburg
JF1
JF1
4 months ago
Reply to  Alan Strasburg

I’m glad you agree with me – even though you don’t know my name. And even happier to hear you’re voting as I will be. I hope there are many more of us come election day.

Last edited 4 months ago by JF1