Council Rejects ‘Public Safety Collaborative,’ Saying Public Safety Commission Should Do the Job

Unable to reach consensus on what a new “Public Safety Collaborative” should look like, the West Hollywood City Council tabled the idea on Monday night.

Mayor Lindsey Horvath suggested the city bring together experts of various public safety organizations to discuss ways of addressing issues like domestic violence, sexual assault, homelessness, LGBTQ equality and racial inequity.

In a memo regarding the proposal, Horvath said, “The goals of the Public Safety Collaborative include empowering community-based response to public safety concerns; sharing information and resources across jurisdictions; finding the best ways to prevent crime; enhancing support for victims of crime; and improving community members’ experience with law enforcement and the criminal justice system.”

Councilmembers John Duran and John D’Amico were both confused by the idea, wondering why the city’s Public Safety Commission wasn’t being tasked with researching and discussing these issues instead.

“Our Public Safety Commission needs some deeper knowledge of public safety opportunities, the public safety question,” said D’Amico.

Horvath agreed that the Public Safety Commission should be having such deeper conversations, but unfortunately it is not. She suggested the collaborative would provide reports to the Commission and that commissioners likely would be able to sit in on some of the collaborative’s meetings.

Horvath explained the point of this group was to bring the experts together to share ideas, comparing it to the Domestic Violence Community Response Team which the city formed in 2011.

She also indicated that her vision was that collaborative meetings would be closed to the public, thus allowing experts to have those deeper and franker discussions.

“There’s a different level of discussion that happens when it’s not in a Brown Acted setting,” said Horvath. “When you have a group of service providers talking about things, it’s a different kind of conversation than when you have members of the public coming and talking about their experience.”

Duran, D’Amico and Councilmember Lauren Meister felt the meetings should be open and publicly noticed. That way there would be an agenda and minutes taken. Duran felt the meetings even should be televised.

Horvath expressed doubt that some of the providers and experts she envisioned including in the collaborative would agree to come if it was a Brown Acted [publicly noticed and agendized] group.

However, D’Amico felt holding closed meetings at a time when transparency is of utmost importance especially regarding policing issues was wrong.

“Having discussions about public safety behind closed doors in antithetical to all those marches the public has had,” said D’Amico.

With the item tabled, Horvath may revise her idea and bring it back to the Council for a future date.

0 0 vote
Article Rating

Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Danielle Harris
Danielle Harris
13 days ago

Ah, shucks! Queen Lindsey didn’t get her way. Thank you to her council colleagues for putting the brakes on her half-baked idea to pad her resume while leading the charge to hold meetings behind closed doors about public safety. Is there some irony here?

Sunshine is good. Except, of course, when you are overseeing the illegal painting of a flag on city property in the middle of the night. Thanks for the memories!

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
13 days ago

Which Council members were endorsed by ALADS, the union for the Sheriffs’ deputies? Not Lauren Meister.

Alan Strasburg
Alan Strasburg
13 days ago

It’s hard to follow the twisted logic that would have Horvath thinking that her “vision” of secrecy would be in the best interests of an open society and democratic system of representative governance, but she did get to plaster her name on the initiating memo, so there’s that for her resume. If she thinks that the public safety commission isn’t sufficiently doing its job, perhaps she could work with the system to fix it, but clearly (see complicity in criminal vandalism) working with the system is not her forte.

Last edited 13 days ago by Alan Strasburg
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x