State Assembly Approves Richard Bloom’s Bill to Close Ellis Act Loopholes

The California State Assembly has approved AB 1399, Assemblymember Richard Bloom’s (D-Santa Monica) measure to close loopholes in the Ellis Act that have allowed some landlords to displace tenants and raise the price of rent control units. Though misuse of the Ellis Act has existed for decades, the current housing crisis has exacerbated the problem.

“The housing crisis has left tenants increasingly vulnerable in the face of rapidly escalating housing costs,” said Assemblymember Bloom in an announcement of the Assembly decision. “Though insulated from some of these price increases, tenants in rent control units are at risk of displacement by landlords who want to exploit loopholes to raise rents to market prices.  AB 1399 protects these tenants and prevents the loss of affordable housing in cities with rent control.”

The Ellis Act gives rental property owners the right to exit the rental housing market, but also places conditions and restrictions on landlords who evict tenants in order to exit the market. These conditions include a requirement to notify tenants 120 days prior to withdrawing a unit, with a longer one year notification requirement for tenants who are disabled or above the age of 62. The Act also restricts when owners can re-enter the market and what price they can re-rent units at when they re-enter, and requires that all units in a building be removed simultaneously.  As the housing crisis has driven up the market rate for rental units, landlords are increasingly subverting the Ellis Act and using it to evict tenants living in rent control units. These landlords often withdraw individual units from the rental market and return them in a piecemeal manner to avoid the Act’s restrictions and to evade rent control. In the Los Angeles area alone, over 20,000 rent-stabilized units have been removed from the rental market since 2001, with tens of thousands of tenants evicted in the process.

AB 1399 clarifies the Ellis Act by setting one withdrawal date for a property; by clarifying that the date on which the accommodations are deemed to have been withdrawn from the rental market is the date on which the final tenancy among all tenants is terminated, and clarifies that owners may not pay prior tenants liquidated damages in lieu of offering them the opportunity to re-rent their former unit.

The bill is supported by a number of organizations, including the City of West Hollywood, which has long been a champion of affordable housing.

“West Hollywood is very pleased to see AB 1399 by Assemblymember Richard Bloom approved by the legislature,” said West Hollywood Mayor John D’Amico. “The City of West Hollywood has long advocated for fair housing and tenant-related laws. AB 1399 will prevent abusive practices by those landlords who look to take advantage of legal loopholes to evict tenants from their homes. We commend Assemblymember Richard Bloom for his relentless efforts and urge Governor Gavin Newsome to sign this bill into law.”

“For too long, ambiguities in the Ellis Act have allowed some landlords to evict tenants simply for higher profits. AB 1399 will give renters more protection against such practices,” said Assemblymember Bloom.

AB 1399, approved on Thursday, now heads to the Governor’s office for his signature. 

Richard Bloom represents California’s 50th Assembly District, which includes the communities of Agoura Hills, Bel Air, Beverly Hills, Brentwood, Hollywood, Malibu, Pacific Palisades, Santa Monica, Topanga, West Hollywood, and West Los Angeles.


14
Please leave a reply of no more than 300 words, focused on the issue and not fellow commenters.

avatar
2000
7 Comment threads
7 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
12 Comment authors
Unions are the bigger problemGaryKarenConstituentJosh Kurpies Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Gary
Guest

Where is developer-champion state Senator Scott Wiener on this bill? Wiener may just want highrise condos for high-tech. Developers and high-tech corporations have BILLION TO PROVIDE POLITICIANS who do their bidding.

roz
Guest
roz

Government controlled housing, better known as communism!
Democratic socialists, California is ruined!

Gavin R. Putland
Guest
Gavin R. Putland

What’s better than rent control? A tax on vacant lots and unoccupied buildings. While rent control makes it less attractive to supply accommodation, a vacant-property tax makes it less attractive NOT to! A vacant-property tax of $X/week makes it $X/week more expensive to fail to get a tenant, and thereby REDUCES, by $X/week, the minimum rent that will persuade the owner to accept a tenant. Such a tax, although sometimes called a “vacancy tax”, is not limited to what real-estate agents call “vacancies” — that is, properties available for rent. It also applies to vacant lots and other properties that… Read more »

Observer
Guest
Observer

Hopefully, this is the first step to repeal both Ellis and Costa-Hawkins !!

Constituent
Guest
Constituent

Let’s repeal the right to own private property too!

Constituent
Guest
Constituent

And while we’re at it, let’s put price controls on martinis at the Abbey!

Eric Jon Schmidt
Guest
Eric Jon Schmidt

It seems our Mayor thinks that the 80% of West Hollywood Residents are not paying attention. He says he supports affordable housing, yet he takes campaign donations from developers who build expensive apartment buildings. Who does he represent? The residents or the developers?It’s kind of hard to do both. With over 50% of Weho residents under the age of 40, hopefully we will get some new younger blood to run for City Council. The old school ways of running this town, especially for renters, is not working anymore.

Joshua88
Guest
Joshua88

The parameters look great. Are there any unwelcome addons that we might be surprised by later?

Josh Kurpies
Guest
Josh Kurpies

Full disclosure, I work for Assemblymember Bloom, but no, there isn’t anything in the bill that someone might be surprised by later. In fact, the only thing people might be surprised about is that, although very important and necessary, does not stop the use of Ellis Act evictions. Any property owner who chooses to legally Ellis their property today, will still be able to do so after this bill becomes law. This bill only curtails bad actors from using loopholes to subvert elements of the Ellis Act. This is a small but important victory for tenants. Please encourage the Governor… Read more »

Karen
Guest
Karen

Well, you haven’t discussed the unintended consequences of this bill. Why not? You cannot hamstring honest home and apartment landlords and think that tenants won’t be adversely effected in the long term.

Josh Kurpies
Guest
Josh Kurpies

Hi Karen. This bill does not change the intended nature of the Ellis Act. As I mentioned above, anyone who intends to legally evict tenants using the Ellis Act today, will not be affected by this law. This law resolves some of the issues that cities were reporting to us where people were not following the rules during the process.
While there is always a risk of unintended consequence when laws are created, amended or repealed, I can say with a high level of certainty, any unintended consequences from this bill would be minimal to none.

Michael L. Grace
Guest

The enemies of West Hollywood are developers, their lobbyists, and any City Council member that takes money from them.

The WEHO citizen’s revolution has begun.

Vigilant
Guest
Vigilant

And any two faced commissioners that are also on the dole to facilitate projects. This city has an ethics and credibility problem that cannot be ignored. The ethics team that is periodically trotted out is hopelessly sad and ineffectual.

Unions are the bigger problem
Guest
Unions are the bigger problem

While developers invest in communities – unions suck money out and control the jobs in our local neighborhoods – if you want to see West Hollywood completely destroyed vote for a consistent who has union support. 1) no locals will get jobs 2) prices will rise. 3) aging in place is even deader a senior won’t be able to afford the corner store. Unions are trying to control the city elections, cannabis, hotels and restaurants- I’d rather support a developer.