Opinion: Tonight the City Council Can Take a Stand on a (Local) Ethics Issue, But Will It?


Mayor John Duran and City Councilmembers John D’Amico and Lindsey Horvath have devoted a lot of time and energy in recent weeks to taking a stand against President Donald Trump. That has been a way for them to declare to the rest of the country what West Hollywood is all about – equal rights and acceptance of people no matter their gender, color, sexual orientation, religion or nationality.

Tonight, as the City Council members sit high on their dais in the City Council Chamber, they have an opportunity to take another stand — one on a national matter that actually will have a local impact (although it won’t get them on CNN). They can vote against renewing Wells Fargo’s banking contract with the City of West Hollywood. The City Council also can take a much-needed stand on ethics by asking Mayor Duran to recuse himself from that vote and the vote on the Arts Club because of his conflict of interest.

In a country where most every bank has been plagued by scandal, Wells Fargo pretty much has the rest of them beat. News of its scandals, which have had serious financial impact on Wells Fargo customers (likely including some in West Hollywood) never seems to end. A story on CNN’s Money website chronicles many of the scandals. But there’s more. CNN reported last month that Wells Fargo announced it is “setting aside $114 million to rebate fiduciary and custody clients in its wealth management business that were charged ‘incorrect fees’ over the past seven years. These customers are primarily individuals with trust, estate and custodial accounts managed by Wells Fargo.” Also last month “Wells Fargo said that a third-party investigation into its foreign-exchange business found the bank may be on the hook for $171 million to clients.”

And then there’s that story published by Bloomberg News in March identifying Wells Fargo as the “go to bank for gunmakers and the NRA.”

Not renewing the city’s banking contract will put an unfortunate strain on City Hall, which will have to go through the complex process of setting up new checking accounts and dealing with different processes than its Finance employees have been used to with Wells Fargo. But standing up for what one believes in – fairness, integrity and honesty – isn’t always easy.

It also may put a strain on Mayor Duran, who chairs the Gay Men’s Chorus of Los Angeles. Duran’s passionate defense of Wells Fargo and advocacy for renewing its contract is inspired, he says, by its support of LGBT causes. It’s more than likely that Wells Fargo’s financial support for LGBT causes has cost the bank a lot less than the losses its customers have suffered from its unethical behavior.

That raises the other issue on which Duran needs to recuse himself. The City Council also is being asked tonight to approve a number of changes in zoning rules to accommodate a nine-story building on Sunset Boulevard to house the West Hollywood branch of London’s Arts Club. Guess who is a recent beneficiary of cash from the Arts Club? And then there are the contributions to GMCLA from those applying for a cannabis license and, as chronicled before, city vendors and developers and the lobbyists who represent them.

So, congratulations to the mayor and members of the West Hollywood City Council for shouting out to the world the city’s opposition to Donald Trump and his unethical, discriminatory and hurtful policies. Now can the City Council  just proclaim (not quite so loudly) that West Hollywood is a city whose government cares about its own ethics as much as it does about those of the president?


10 Comments
  1. The argument that a change in banking relationships will pose a significant burden on city staff is a huge red herring. Organizations change banking relationships with great frequency. You fill out a few forms, get some signatures, update the Quickbooks (or whatever program), and flip the switch. One day you’re at Wells, the next day you’re at (fill in the blank).

  2. For those who aren’t observant this City of ours sold its soul down the drain to the developers years ago. Many of you just weren’t here to read and observe it at the time. Now it’s become so commonplace not one even thinks about the next tractor, crane, cement trunk, excavator, etc. And with every new big building development approved they say, “It will have no significant impact on traffic.” Of course it won’t – traffic doesn’t move now anyway! The developers have bought and paid for this city parcel by parcel and it’s too late to stop it. But our City Council is responsible for it. And benefits???

  3. I love the design of the proposed Arts Club. Will really bring some class to a part of the strip that is lacking.

  4. This is a good opportunity to work with WF and allow them to make amends by giving more back to our community. I would not throw the baby out with the bath water. There is great opportunity here. Hopefully the Council will see the opportunity and act upon it and demand that WF help us with a homeless shelter and other services for our Residents in exchange for the City renewing the contract. Most banks have a history of bad behavior, let’s not make a rash decision.

  5. Mayor Duran lived adjacent to the Arts Club property for many years, yet he moved a handful of years ago – right about the time a redevelopment item would have been filed with the Planning Dept.

    It begs the question to ask whether the Mayor used inside information to determine it was time to leave, and it makes one wonder why it’s OK for his now-former neighbors to have to put up with the really awful realities of construction of a major project as well as the loss of quiet enjoyment of their homes after this monstrosity opens.

    I am well-aware that the DuranTrolls will respond to this with NIMBYisms, and I would offer that they take up residence in the Mayor’s former domicile during the construction.

    1. What are you talking about? He hasn’t moved anywhere. He’s like everyone else in a rent controlled apartment. They aren’t leaving unless forced out.

  6. God bless you for bringing up fairness, integrity and honesty. Might you be forgetting these are the people who gave Stormy Daniels the key to the city? Anyway, city council meetings— I’ve gone to a number over the years. Highly recommend just for the eyeroll factor. There’s a few guys who think they run the city even though they’re just civilians who fancy themselves ‘experts’ who know better than the professionals. Gotta show up to every meeting to stand up and get their attention fix and strokes I guess. LOL.

  7. Although Wells Fargo is problematic, it would severely inconvenience a lot of WeHo residents who use Wells Fargo. People should be able to choose if they want to do business with Wells Fargo on a person by person basis and not have the city choose for them.

    1. A decision by the City of West Hollywood to not renew its contract with Wells Fargo would have no impact on the bank’s relationship with its individual customers

      1. Indeed, this monstrous bank is not going to go under, simply because the City of West Hollywood takes a stand, and refuses to do business with them.

Comments are closed.