LA County DA Declines to Charge Ed Buck in Death of Gemmel Moore

Gemmel “Juelz” Moore (left) and Ed Buck (Facebook)

Los Angeles County prosecutors declined Thursday to pursue any criminal charges against prominent Democratic donor Ed Buck stemming from the drug-overdose death of a 26-year-old man in Buck’s West Hollywood home.

According to a charge-evaluation worksheet prepared by the District Attorney’s Office, the evidence is “insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that (Buck) is responsible for the death of Gemmel Moore. Likewise, the admissible evidence is insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that suspect Buck furnished drugs to Gemmel Moore or that suspect Buck possessed drugs.”

Moore was found dead of a methamphetamine overdose on July 27, 2017, inside Buck’s Laurel Avenue home in West Hollywood. The coroner’s office ruled Moore’s death an accident, noting that there was drug paraphernalia found in the home, along with sex toys and clear plastic bags containing what was suspected to be methamphetamine, according to a coroner’s report obtained by the Los Angeles Times.

According to The Times, the report also notes that somebody at the scene “is suspected to be known to exchange drugs for sex,” but the name is redacted. Moore was found naked on a living room mattress with a “male pornography movie playing on the television,” the report states.

With the death ruled accidental, however, no arrests were made and no charges were filed.

Buck’s attorney, Seymour Amster, has repeatedly denied that Buck had any involvement in Moore’s death. He said Buck and Moore were good friends, and told The Times that Buck did not witness Moore injecting drugs the night he died.

“I think it’s time to bring this tragedy to a conclusion,” he said in November. “This was an accidental death. This was an unfortunate death … but that doesn’t mean we can make spurious accusations and spin something out of control.”

Moore’s mother, LaTisha Nixon, continued to push the sheriff’s department to investigate her son’s death. She noted that her son had been living with her in Texas, but Buck bought him a plane ticket to return to Los Angeles, which he did the day he died. Moore, who was black, had previously been homeless and worked as an escort.

Buck, who is white, is a longtime political activist and noted Democratic political donor, along with being active in LGBTQ political circles, The Times reported. He also once ran for a seat on the West Hollywood City Council. He was a major backer of the ban on fur sales enacted by the City Council at the behest of Councilmember John D’Amico, whose campaign for office Buck supported.

In mid-August, excerpts from Moore’s personal journal were made public as part of an effort to push for a renewed investigation into his death. In it, Moore wrote in December 2016 that he has “become addicted to drugs and the worst one at that. Ed Buck is the one to thank.” Moore wrote that Buck gave him his first injection of crystal meth.

The sheriff’s department announced on Aug. 15, 2017, that it was conducting a follow-up investigation into Moore’s death “out of an abundance of caution.” That investigation concluded earlier this month, and the case was presented to the District Attorney’s Office, leading to Thursday’s decision against pursuing charges.

Nixon is expected to hold a news conference Friday at 7 p.m outside the West Hollywood Sheriff’s Station at 780 N. San Vicente Blvd. to respond to the prosecutors’ decision.  Nixon is expected to release a video in which another young black man alleges he was given drugs by Buck. As WEHOville has reported, Buck was back soliciting young black men under a new profile on the Adam4Adam gay sex site shortly after Moore’s death.

Amster has continued to insist on Buck’s innocence. He told NBC4 last week: “This was an unfortunate situation, this was a tragedy. “But it does not justify accusing an innocent man of things that did not happen.”


4 Comments
  1. Buck should have at the least been charged with “Felony Reckless Endangerment”
    The legal definition is “a person is guilty of reckless endangerment in the first degree when, under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life, he recklessly engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of death to another person. Reckless endangerment in the first degree is a class D felony.”

    It was well known in the community that Buck, a 63rd old influential politico was a “Meth Addict”; photos on his Facebook show visible needle “track marks” on his arms.

    So Buck invites a 26-year old sex worker to his home for a drug induced sex party and a few hours later, the 26-year old is found dead of a “Meth overdose” in a “Meth addict’s home” where there is a ton of” drug paraphernalia”. Seems pretty obvious that (Buck) “Recklessly engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of death to another person.”

    Buck should have and would have done some jail time and maybe even gotten some well needed treatment and rehab fo his own addiction.

    1. In New York. This is California. New York law does not establish or define a crime in California. Furthermore, if you maintain that Buck invited Moore for a drug and sex party, then it is no longer reckless endangerment (which is negligence) because it was a series of intentional illegal acts that lead to a death, and thus would be manslaughter. For it to be reckless endangerment, he would have had to have not invited Moore for a drug party but instead for some other purpose, which somehow lead to Moore getting killed by “drug paraphernalia,” which of course is absurd and not the way the law is applied. The paraphernalia was not even an attractive nuisance because Moore was a competent adult who made his own choice to take lethal drugs, and even wrote in his diary beforehand that he was going to. Get a law degree before you play a lawyer in a public forum or decide on a whim whether or not someone should be locked up in jail on the basis of your five second Google query.

Comments are closed.