WeHo Planning Commission Approves Melrose Triangle Project

Melrose Triangle project site plan
Melrose Triangle project site plan

The West Hollywood Planning Commission unanimously approved the proposed Melrose Triangle project Thursday night at a meeting at which some residents objected to the demolition of the “Streamline Moderne” building at 9080 Santa Monica Blvd. that currently sits on the site.

The project site is bounded on the west by North Almont Drive and on the north and south by Santa Monica Boulevard and Melrose Avenue, which intersect at Doheny Drive facing Beverly Hills. Alan Pullman, founder of Studio One Eleven, the project’s architect, describes the westernmost of its three buildings as “a beacon of entry into the city.”

Members of the West Hollywood Preservation Association (WHPA) said the project should incorporate the 9080 Santa Monica building, built in 1928 and now empty, into its modern design.

“If this building was in South Beach, there would be a giant, gay riot to save this building,” said Roy Oldenkamp, WHPA’s vice president. “There is not going to be any such riot because of a lethargic community.”

A report commissioned by the city from LSA Associates, an environmental impact consultant, has recommended that the 9080 Santa Monica building be moved if it cannot be kept at the existing location.

Other objections raised by speakers included the likelihood of increased traffic in the area, parking problems and the possibility that the building’s four levels of underground parking would intrude on the water table under the site, which was raised by Jeanne Dobrin.

Commissioner Marc Yeber said that wouldn’t be an issue. “Hydrology is dealt with. They de-water, seal it up, and it’s fine,” he said.

Several residents praised the project. “If Beverly Hills can deal with their traffic, why can’t we?” said Bobbie Edrick, addressing complaints that the project would cause more traffic. “I would hope that I see this project completed in my lifetime.”

Another supporter was Jim Banks. “I’m here to show my support for the project,” he said. “Our western gateway has been an eyesore along a dead stretch of Santa Monica for as far back as I can remember.”

The project has been under development since 2004. The latest iteration of it, presented to the commission’s Design Review Subcommittee in February, drew praise from committee members, who had expressed concerns about the mass of the building previously proposed and about plans at that time to build six levels of underground parking.

As approved, the 303,000 square foot project will consist of three buildings with a wide public passageway connecting Santa Monica Boulevard with Melrose Avenue. It will house offices, restaurants and shops and 76 residential units, 15 of which would be reserved for low- and moderate-income renters. It will include 884 parking spaces, 94 more than are required by city codes.

Melrose Triangle is a project of the Charles Company, a real estate development and leasing firm owned by Arman and Mark Gabay of Beverly Hills. Charles Company also owns Excel Property Management and has other wholly or partially owned affiliates such as Broadway Square LLC, System LLC, Sancam, Oppidan LLC.


newest oldest
Notify of
wehoenthusiast
Guest
wehoenthusiast

my comment wasn’t “approved” yet now full it had profanity or anything against people. So in the hence of time will just put a brief version back and if deleted again well ? The traffic is a nightmare starting at 3 ish to 7pm, I do both the city line and drive but because leaving west Hollywood at times. I LOVE west Hollywood been here 20 years but now being disabled it has been a challenge. I can drive. but sick alot. What I love is the subzided bus via city hall and housing, via mostly public housing through west… Read more »

K.K.
Guest

There is a fight to save the, built in 1928 but redesigned and expanded in 1938, Wurdeman and Becket Streamline Moderne building. WE ARE FIGHTING! — It is not too late! This building is a rare and important building from the early career of two of the most important and famous architects in the world. And there is no other Streamline Moderne building in West Hollywood. Destroying this building will be a global embarrassment if we let it happen. When this building is restored it would make a great Visitor Center or Museum for the Design district. And what better… Read more »

MB
Guest
MB

@ K. K. Please. The building in question is not “original.” It was renovated some time after it was built to what it is now. The building is not historic – it was a pet hospital. This development plan has been bounced around for 10+ years and no one has ever thought or tried to “save” this building prior to now. As the Planning Commission stated at the meeting – there actually are rules on the books that prevent people from trying to stop a project from going forth after plans have been submitted for approval. This building (that whole… Read more »

MB
Guest
MB

@ Leslie again…and yes, there are a lot of new and exciting projects happening at relatively the same time. We should be thankful that the economy has picked up and these new projects are bringing new life and benefit to areas of our City that have had empty buildings or lots on them for years, building that have been eyesores or areas that have been underutilized for some time.

MB
Guest
MB

@ Leslie. The residents north of the project did not dismiss the issues of traffic and parking – we just realize that without any pain there is no gain. Once the project is completed, there will be 400+ new parking spaces available to the public in the evenings and on weekends – a tremendous gain for this end of town. The Commission discussed ways in which to ensure that construction vehicles do not greatly impact the neighborhood during construction (there will of course be some inconveniences like with any project but in the end the memory of those difficult days… Read more »

MB
Guest
MB

@Shawn. I am a resident of West Hollywood and was at the Planning Commission Meeting the other night. I support this project. So when you say that the Commission doesn’t listen to the residents….you’re wrong. They listened pretty good to me and the others that are in favor of this project (I guess you feel they don’t listen because they didn’t listen to you). This western end of our City has been a mess for 20+years. This project alone has been bounced around for 10+years. I, along with other residents, are very, very happy that this project is finally moving… Read more »

Shawn Thompson
Guest

The planning commision doesn’t listen to the residents. Its been shown time and time again. They are just puppets of the council members that appointed them and have rubber stamped all the forced density into the city for years, The only plan they have for the city is to allow out of town money to make money grabs in height an density on every new project they can. All the money these developers donated to the 4 long term council members is why this was approved. The urban village is being disassembled project by project as we continue to see… Read more »

Todd Bianco
Guest

@Lynn The 8150 Sunset project is by far a bigger problem and monstrosity than this Melrose Triangle gateway project. And the Chase Bank building with the folded roof, floating stairs and mosaic is in far better state of preservation than the Streamline Moderne building on Melrose. I’m very much in favor of incorporating the Chase Bank building into the project as there is much more land to work with and it’s in a good corner. As you pointed out, it has fast-track status from the Governor’s office so it may go faster than anyone thought and we will have little… Read more »

Manny
Guest
Manny

@Richard K…..Accolades for good architecture are not only deserved when referring to Paris. This thoughtful design and function is good for this American city.

My reference is West Hollywood because I live here, not Paris…….and the Starbucks would fit nicely on the corner of Almont and Melrose.

Lynn Russell
Guest
Lynn Russell

@Richard K: In the not too distant future, we will be dealing with another “Gateway Proposal” in the form of 8150 SUNSET, also lauded as iconic. The EIR has not yet been distributed but the owners, Townscape Partners have wrangled some special considerations based on SB743 potentially limiting criticism and positive input regarding aesthetic elements. Although 8150 SUNSET is technically in LA, the adjacent neighborhood in West Hollywood will be seriously affected on multiple levels: traffic, transportation etc. as will be the hills above the Chateau Marmont and Lauren Canyon. There seem to be forward thinkers with goals when it… Read more »

Richard K.
Guest
Richard K.

Addendum: Perhaps our city council will have a more far reaching and meaningful vision for what West Hollywood is now and should be in the years to come. Look to the great cities of the world, would they have a shopping center as their “gateway”? Don’t minimize what West Hollywood represents to the world and don’t celebrate that we may be all about the shopping. If this is indeed the “gateway” then this is an important opportunity and challenge to create something that is everlasting, not just another hip, mixed use mall without a nod or monument to the residents… Read more »

Riley
Guest
Riley

As I watched last night’s meeting I was more than mildly amused that some of the commissioners actually tried to compare the Eastside Gateway to this Westside Gateway Plan, going as far as to say, the “beautiful” gateway on the eastside. Are they kidding? What in heaven’s name is beautiful about the new, ugly, square, over-sized, over priced mixed use structures or the really ugly, crime-ridden Target/Best Buy/Fast food gateway with the giant, garish, flashing billboard? If the developers had proposed a giant, flashing billboard for this at the Melrose Triangle project, all hell would have broken loose. The city… Read more »

Leslie K
Guest
Leslie K

I was at the meeting last night and found it very curious that ALL of the residents north of Santa Monica gushed over the project, dismissing traffic and neighborhood parking issues. Only the residents south of SM raised these very real concerns. As Sheila Higgins so passionately and eloquently noted, neither the planning commission nor the city council are taking into consideration the cumulative effect of all the projects slated for approval and/or construction including those at SM and San Vicente, the two on SM near La Cienega, San Vicente at Melrose, Melrose at Norwich and Melrose at La Cienega.