WEHOville

WeHo May Become One of Six Cities Where Bars Can Pour Until Four

Wed, Nov 29, 2017   By Staff    12 Comments

West Hollywood is one of six cities in California where bars could remain open as late 4 a.m. if the state legislature passes a new bill proposed by state Sen. Scott Weiner (D-San Francisco).

Weiner announced today that he plans to introduce the bill in January. An earlier bill introduced by Weiner, which would have allowed any city in California to extend drinking hours to 4 a.m., failed to pass. Currently no alcohol can be served in public places after 2 a.m.

Weiner’s latest bill would establish a five-year pilot program known as the LOCAL (Let Our Communities Adjust Late-Night) Act. Limiting it to the six cities that endorsed Weiner’s earlier bill makes it more likely to get passed.

Those cities are Los Angeles, Long Beach, Oakland, Sacramento, San Francisco and West Hollywood. The LOCAL Act would let each of those cities decide whether to extend its drinking hours and to choose exactly when bars would have to stop pouring.

The West Hollywood City Council endorsed Weiner’s earlier proposal in a four to one vote in April, with Councilmember Lauren Meister opposing extension of the bar hours.  The City Council also has embraced the sale of recreational marijuana with a program that will start issuing licenses to dealers next year.

Extending bar hours has drawn opposition from some in Los Angeles such as L.A. City Councilmember Paul Koretz. Other opponents of the earlier Weiner proposal are Alcohol Justice, the California Alcohol Policy Alliance, Mothers Against Drunk Driving and the Los Angeles Drug and Alcohol Policy Alliance. Extending bar hours got the support of the California Restaurant Association, California Travel Association and the California Hotel & Lodging Association.

If Weiner’s bill passes and is signed by Gov. Jerry Brown, the question of whether to actually extend bar and restaurant  drinking hours and on what days and until what hour is likely to provoke a community debate in West Hollywood. On the one hand, the city depends heavily on revenue from tourists (the hotel room occupancy tax is the single largest source of revenue to the city’s general fund). And West Hollywood is known as a nightlife destination, with its Boystown gay nightlife district on the west side of Santa Monica Boulevard and the many clubs on the Sunset Strip and relatively new ones such as Delilah in the Center City area.

On the other hand, West Hollywood is the city with the most restaurant/bar liquor licenses per capita in all of Los Angeles County. Based on the number of restaurant/bar liquor licenses in 2015, WeHo by the Numbers reports that West Hollywood also ranks No. 1 in all of California in licenses per square mile, with 116.  An organization called the Safe WeHo Leadership Council has been formed to develop ways to reduce alcohol-related problems in West Hollywood.

Opponents of Weiner’s proposal have questioned whether extending bar hours will lead to an increase in drunken driving and other alcohol-related crimes and injuries and whether they will tax local public safety organizations such as the West Hollywood Sheriff’s Station.

Tagged , , , , ,

You might also like:

12 Comments

  1. Preventable CrimesMon, Dec 04, 2017 at 7:49 pm

    A simple question: Does West Hollywood want to be known as a responsible city or an irresponsible one that encourages excessive drinking and its tangential problems? The current crime factor is disturbing. The city CAN have a more conscientious profile, a healthy restaurant and entertainment business with visitors and residents feeling safe. Later drinking hours and more liquor licenses is NOT the answer.

  2. erikSun, Dec 03, 2017 at 6:33 am

    My friend owns a bar in Weho. He charges $12. for an Absolut and Soda. He told me his total cost, including factoring in payroll and every other aspect of the business, his cost for the drink is 50 Cents. Why do people feel the need to make bar owner even more rich?

  3. TSat, Dec 02, 2017 at 8:44 am

    The Insurance Service Office has completed studies, There is a higher fatality rate in areas where there is longer hours of alcohol being served. Cities like New York, San Francisco where there is a great metro train service has less frequencies.

  4. C.R.Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 5:37 am

    The later you have last call, the more the number of drinkers are gradually thinned out because fewer people stay out as the hours progress. You actually have more drunk drivers on the road with an earlier last call, if you bother to look into this, that’s why it works in other parts of the country, even without mass transit. This is also the Uber/Lyft era. It seems like the other posters here aren’t into the late night drinking scene, so they have no clue. And if you try this on the weekends as I suggested, that’s a lot fewer people commuting to work at 5 am, which isn’t even a legitimate concern anyways.

  5. Anthony A.Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 6:38 am

    We merely need to look at the accidents and injuries or deaths caused by drunk drivers to know this bill serves no one but club owners. How does this benefit the public or general welfare of the City. Why 4am why not 24 hours like Vegas and look how many accidents they have. This benefits the bars. The noise, the traffic and the potential for more drinks on the street or behind the wheel makes this suspect.

  6. erikThu, Nov 30, 2017 at 5:24 pm

    The Leadership of west Hollywood needs to put a stop to this. There will be drunk drivers on the street at 5am and 6am when sober people are driving to work. This doesn’t benefit anyone. If you want to drink yourself to death, do it in the privacy of your own home when you can’t hurt anyone.

  7. MikeThu, Nov 30, 2017 at 9:20 am

    Start drinking too much at an early age and look what happens when you turn 60 or so, if you live that long.

  8. TWed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:07 pm

    More alcohol means more drunks on the road. Most get drunk in the last 2hours before the bars close. 2 more hours of drinking may work in a City like New York that has mass transit.
    life for profit doesn’t add up. We need to think about pubic safely first.

  9. JJWed, Nov 29, 2017 at 4:54 pm

    Mike has a point.

  10. MikeWed, Nov 29, 2017 at 4:03 pm

    From one Mike to another, Mike don’t project fear. Carrie Nation did and that was a hundred years ago and two Constitutional amendments. Your other issue do not relate to bars serving until 4 a.m.

  11. C.R.Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:42 pm

    LONG overdue. As someone originally from the east, I’ve always found the 2 am cutoff ridiculous. A progressive city isn’t one with an early alcohol cutoff time compared to many other places in the nation, not to mention around the world. I often don’t go out until 11:30-12. A fair compromise would be trying this pilot program on Fridays & Saturdays only at first. There’s all types of people here, we aren’t all on the same 24 hour clock!

  12. MikeWed, Nov 29, 2017 at 1:36 pm

    More Crime, More Alcoholism, the will come from all over and leave their crime and trash here. Too much emphasis on alcohol. Doesnt this city have something else to offer its residents such as clean streets without so many homeless…

Leave a Comment (300-400 words maximum please). No profanity, and please focus on the issue rather than attacking other commenters.

Let WEHOville Email the News to You