WEHOville

L.A. Conservancy’s Appeal of 9080 Santa Monica Blvd. Ruling Goes to Court on Oct. 24

Fri, Oct 13, 2017   By Staff    4 Comments

The Los Angeles Conservancy’s appeal of a judge’s decision to reject its challenge to the City of West Hollywood’s approval of the Melrose Triangle project will go before another judge on Oct. 24.

streamline moderne, 9080 santa monica blvd.

The former animal hospital built in the Streamline Moderne style at 9080 Santa Monica Blvd.

In 2016, the Conservancy’s took West Hollywood to court, arguing that the city hadn’t properly considered alternatives that would have allowed the preservation of the Streamline Moderne building at 9080 Santa Monica Blvd. That building sits on part of a site where the Charles Company plans to erect three large buildings that will house shops, offices, restaurants and apartments, all part of what is is being called the Melrose Triangle project.

Advocates for preserving the building argue that its design is architecturally significant. The building was built in 1928 and then renovated in 1938 in the Streamline Moderne style by Wurdeman & Becket, one of whose principals, Welton Becket, designed the Capitol Records building and the Cinerama Dome. For many years, the building served as the Jones Dog & Cat Hospital, whose clients included actors such as Charlie Chaplin.

In his 2016 ruling in favor of the City of West Hollywood, Judge Richard Fruin Jr. said it had properly considered alternatives to the Charles Company’s proposed design, including one that would have tried to integrate the 9080 building into the modern Melrose Triangle design. Fruin noted that the city had reasoned that incorporating the Streamline Moderne building into the Melrose Triangle project would reduce the size of the “gateway” building facing Beverly Hills, would reduce available parking and would create “a discordant architectural appearance.” “The city’s findings are entitled to deference,” Fruin’s ruling stated. “They are, in any event, supported by substantial evidence.”

The Conservancy sought a writ of mandamus, which is, in effect, a petition that another judge consider whether the earlier rejection of its lawsuit was proper.

The hearing date for the Conservancy’s appeal matter is set for argument at 1:30 p.m. on Oct. 24 at the Superior Courthouse in downtown Los Angeles.

Businesses on the site recently were given a 30-day notice to vacate, an indication that the Charles Company is moving forward with its plans.

Tagged , , , , ,

You might also like:

4 Comments

  1. J SimmonsWed, Oct 25, 2017 at 4:17 pm

    I am not in love with this building, but is without doubt a rare “classic historic architectural building in weho” If weho has a policy of preserving historic buildings, it must apply it evenly and to all, not just to small developers and excusing the mega-developers. I see nothing wrong with a preservation group trying to save it, I don’t understand why the at times draconian weho historical preservation is not for saving this historic building.

  2. Grant RutterSun, Oct 22, 2017 at 10:39 am

    This building has run it’s course. It’s a bad look as you cross over into weho from “the new” Beverly Hills. Just let it go.

  3. Jim NasiumSat, Oct 14, 2017 at 6:13 pm

    The Conservancy looses another chunk of credibility every time they make these mistakes.

    There ain’t much left.

  4. JJSat, Oct 14, 2017 at 9:23 am

    This group has held this project up for years with their lawsuits! Tying up or court system with this crap! Save your time and energy for truly historic structures! This building is not even an original Streamline Moderne but was remodeled into that style. I hope this appeal turns out exactly how the first judge ruled. And we can finally get this built!

Leave a Comment (300-400 words maximum please). No profanity, and please focus on the issue rather than attacking other commenters.

Let WEHOville Email the News to You