WEHOville

WeHo Planning Commission Calls Out Proposed La Cienega Condo Building for ‘Exceptional Design’

Fri, Aug 04, 2017   By James F. Mills    8 Comments

Illustration of proposed condominium building at 1136-1142 La Cienega Blvd. (Illustration by Lorcan O’Herlihy Architects)

West Hollywood’s Planning Commission Thursday night gave unanimous approval to a new condominium building with a contemporary design so unique that it will likely become a landmark in the city.

Designed by renowned architect Lorcan O’Herlihy, the L-shaped building will have “stepped massing” on a sloping site. Each floor will be stepped back from the floor below to give the appearance of steps on its southern side, but inverted steps on its northern side.

The five-story, 23-unit, 16,000-square-foot condominium building with two levels of underground parking will replace two single-family houses at 1136 and 1142 La Cienega Boulevard, just south of Fountain Avenue. Four of the units will be set aside for low-income residents.

The commissioners praised O’Herlihy’s design. Newly elected Commission Chair Sue Buckner called it a “beautiful building,” while Commissioner Lynn Hoopingarner said it was an “exceptional design” that will “fit in beautifully with the neighborhood.”

Commissioner Stacy Jones commented, “We don’t really have another building like this in West Hollywood. I do think it is exemplary.”

Commissioner Rogerio Carvalheiro, an architect, declared, “I think this building is a great example of a contemporary building that uses local historic prescience to tailor a project that cultivates urban community both inside and outside its walls.”

“Like La Fontaine, which was built in 1928 on Fountain Avenue, it stacks its building to one side and creates a beautiful courtyard that interacts with the public realm,” Carvalheiro continued. “Like La Fontaine, it goes way above the height limit which creates a beautiful anchor for that intersection and for that street and therefore almost a guiding post for the community.”

Owned by 1136/1142 La Cienega LLC, the project requested a slight modification to the rear setback. City zoning laws require the building be 15 feet from the rear property line. State incorporation filings list 1136/1142 La Cienega LLC as associated with Yosef Simsolo and Yigal Reani.

The design calls for the rear of the building to be pivoted slightly so that windows of the new building will not look directly into the windows of the building behind it on Hacienda Place.

With that pivot design, plans call for the northern part of the building to only be 13.5 feet from the rear property line, while other portions of it will be 17 feet from the property line.

While Commissioner John Altschul loved the project, calling it “extraordinarily magnificent,” he did not approve of this setback modification.

“Setbacks, I think, are sacrosanct,” said Altschul. “It’s not something you can toy with or tweak at your convenience because you need an extra few inches to monetize your project.”

Altschul explained setbacks are there to offer a small degree of privacy with the neighboring property.

“That’s their privacy and it’s sort of all we have to offer in a town of this density,” Altschul said. “The setback requirements are to create a little space between us and our neighbors.”

Hoopingarner agreed, saying the design could be modified to maintain the 15-foot setback throughout.

However, the other commissioners felt that 17-foot setback on the southern end balanced out the 13.5-foot setback on the northern end. Ultimately, the project was approved with language that said it should have an “average” setback of 15 feet across the rear property line.

Several of the nine people speaking during public comment expressed concern about the extra traffic the project would generate on the perpetually congested La Cienega.

The other major concern was about cars leaving the building turning left onto La Cienega. The commission discussed forbidding left turns from the building but realized there was no real way to enforce that rule.

Hoopingarner also warned that the high water table in that part of town might not allow them to dig two levels of underground parking.

After receiving the commission’s blessing, O’Herlihy told WEHOville he enjoyed creating the building.

“It’s an exciting project, because it’s about urban engagement with the street and creating something which avoids big boxes,” O’Herlihy said. “I was very happy with the solution and happy that they liked the project. It’s trying to really think how you do these buildings and that’s the most exciting thing for me. It’s in a creative city and I think the solution is creative.”

Wine Shop Delayed

The Planning Commission was also scheduled to consider a permit for off-site alcohol sales for the Wine Shop at 8500 Sunset Blvd, in western portion of the Sunset-La Cienega project. That 1,000 square foot shop would specialize in selling bottles of premium wine and be connected to the Tesse restaurant, specializing in French Californian cuisine, scheduled to open in November. However, amid concerns that the public notice regarding this hearing not going out in time, the commission voted to postpone that hearing until its Aug 17 meeting.

Tagged ,

You might also like:

8 Comments

  1. Reality based developmentSun, Aug 06, 2017 at 12:47 am

    Are we really getting a translucent building? Do we believe this rendering? Hmmmm
    Let’s have a public display of photographs showing renderings and finished product.

  2. Shawn ThompsonFri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:48 pm

    More forced density by the planning commission that says yes to everything with people on the commission for decades. What a ruse. Time for term limits on the planning commission AKA the over develop #weho commission, before #weho is so overdeveloped that all the mixed uses that already have vacant commercial at the bottom turn into a tidal wave of empty stores and for lease signs. Is this the future of the Urban Village, or is death rattle as it turns the corner to a lost identity for greed

  3. RMDFri, Aug 04, 2017 at 5:11 pm

    Hopefully it will be better engineered than some of his other projects around town? ( 825 N. Kings Rd is one example that has cost it’s HOA’s a fortune!)

  4. AGRFri, Aug 04, 2017 at 4:08 pm

    If this qualifies as exceptional design then I’ll have to start submitting my napkin drawings from when I’m bored.

  5. Henry (Hank) ScottFri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:38 am

    Finally got a good one from the architect!

  6. Todd BiancoFri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:22 am

    I can discern exactly nothing from about that design from the rendering. If the Planning Commission thinks it’s great, I’m willing to go along. It’s not a dense (only 23 units) or tall (5 stories), so it won’t be out of scale for the area.

    But what I do know is that the location is terrible and the rendering makes it look like a calm, open, pedestrian-friendly stretch of street. Nope. Not even close. It’s on an extremely busy and crowded section on the east side of La Cienega between Fountain and Holloway. It will be sandwiched between two other similarly tall condo/apartment buildings and it will create another traffic nightmare because of that location. Two lanes of traffic now turn north on La Cienega from eastbound Holloway and there is the usual heavy stream of traffic driving up La Cienega to Sunset from the south. There is no good way to stage the construction for that lot and provide parking for workers that won’t be bad for the surrounding neighbors and traffic flow for a very long time. And anyone buying a condo there will have to think very hard about safely getting in and out whenever they drive.

  7. J SimmonsFri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:14 am

    That’s my point. The group of Planning Commissioners are not degreed city planners, architects nor experts into architectural design, despite each one believing they are (not a dis – put people in a Titled City Official Title, put them up on the deis and the formality imposed where they ask, but are never are asked to explain or challenge their stated belief.

    As for “classic bungalow” preservation, The Hancock street collection of official historic bungalows, higher quality and design, and in a row, group, it gives the preservation proper respect and the owners seem to love the historic sign and have some of the best kept homes and yards out there.

    Finally, (Google it if interested) It is absolute FACT in Arcitectural teaching and projects:

    “DESIGN BY COMMITTEE” (a group of legit good architects) WHEN DESIGNING AS A GROUP, THE FINAL DESIGN AND BUILDING IS ALWAYS NOT AS ATTRACTIVE, FUNCTIONAL, COHESIVE OR JUST AS NICE AS IT WOULD HAVE BEEN WITH ONE ARCHITECT FOR DESIGN.

    Having untrained amatures trying to appear compotent for their title, feel they MUST always contribute with a design flaw nobody else “saw”. Every finished building having gone through Planning Committee, has come out less attractive and esthetically balanced for the site.

    Likewise, the first to jump on seeing “historic value” leads everyone on their own (not consciously) to agree with the same or more certainty as the first to jump onto a full bandwagon of Definitely Historic.

    THE PROCESS (and not bad intent on the appointee leads to bad group decisions every time)

    EVEN IF SO HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT: They are in shambles, it will cost over a million for a person to buy and god knows how much to OVER THE TOP CUTE REDO.

    Nobody who wants to do that, and has the money, wouldn’t take those homes being the last two single family homes surrounded by the most congested condo/apartment street in weho.

    The City Can sell it for a dollar to that (what’s it’s name) Historic Square … Just north of downtown, off the right hand side of the Pasadena Freeway, where it could be a charity deduction or gift by the city to a “museum preserving the early era homes that were the beginning of la. They can properly restore them and put them in proper context and visitors can go like an outdoor museum of fully restored homes like the Committee feels the weho ones are so Architecturally significant.

  8. blueeyedboyFri, Aug 04, 2017 at 8:35 am

    It sure would be nice if there was a picture of the building!

Leave a Comment (300-400 words maximum please). No profanity, and please focus on the issue rather than attacking other commenters.

Let WEHOville Email the News to You