This Year’s LA Pride Was $395,000 in the Red

ADVERTISEMENT
LA Pride 2016. (Photo by Derek Wear of Unikorn Photography)
LA Pride 2016. (Photo by Derek Wear of Unikorn Photography)

Christopher Street West (CSW), the non-profit organization that puts on the annual L.A. Pride festival and parade, lost $395,000 on this year’s Pride event.

According to a copy of CSW’s 2016 profit and loss statement made available to WEHOville, CSW’s overall revenue was $2.1 million, 30% less than budgeted. Its overall expenses were $2.5 million, 13% less than budgeted. CSW had projected a $162,000 profit.

Major factors in the loss included a 30% shortfall in projected revenue from festival admission tickets. CSW had projected revenue of $1.3 million (44% of the total revenue from the event), but realized only $915,710. Another shortfall was in revenue anticipated from beverage sales, which at $250,000 was down 65% from the $718,000 that CSW had projected.

However CSW did do better in selling sponsorships, with revenue of $800,000 compared to the $700,000 it had budgeted. Sponsors included major brands such as Wells Fargo, Delta Airlines, Nissan and Budweiser. And it realized $93,615 in fees charged to those participating in the Pride parade, compared to the $80,000 it had budgeted.

CSW still has not released its 2015 financials, arguing that they still are under review by its accountant or auditor. And its board of directors did not discuss its financial situation in any detail last night at a meeting at which a reporter and two local residents were present. But at that meeting, board member and former CSW President Steve Ganzell referred to the 2015 Pride festival and parade as very profitable.

CSW President Chris Classen hinted at the possibility of a loss at a community meeting on July 20 to discuss the controversial Pride event but said he wasn’t sure of that.  However the financial document reviewed by WEHOville was dated June 28. Residents and LGBT community members at that community meeting criticized CSW’s efforts to convert the 46-year-old event into a music festival catering to Millennials, its decision to increase festival ticket prices by 40% (later somewhat reduced) and its reduction in events for the lesbian and transgender communities.

ADVERTISEMENT
Chris Classen
Chris Classen

At its meeting last night, CSW board members addressed some of that criticism, with members generally agreeing to try to work more closely with LGBT community organizations going forward. Much of the conversation also focused on last weekend’s DTLA Proud, the first Pride event in downtown Los Angeles. Some CSW board members noted that DTLA Proud, also a non-profit, had brought together community organizations and bar owners and promoters to stage the event. With the CSW board agreeing to work more closely with non-profit community organizations, long-time board member Ganzell withdrew his proposal to force Classen to step down from his role as president.

Another subject of last night’s meeting was complaints by some board members of a lack of transparency. Andy Sacher, who is founder and CEO of the Lavender Effect, and Karina Samala, board president of the Imperial Court of Los Angeles and Hollywood and member of the L.A. Transgender Advisory Council, said major decisions were being made by only two board members — an apparent reference to Classen and Craig Bowers, who is Classen’s partner in an events business. Bowers responded that board members must be willing to spend more time on Pride planning if they want to know what is going on.

Samala also complained that she has yet to receive information she requested about how much CSW contractors are being paid. Michael Carriere, CSW’s treasurer, said that information is difficult to extract from the organization’s bookkeeping database but that he will make it available to Samala soon. That information, however, is in the profit and loss statement obtained by WEHOville.

It shows that the festival and parade producer was paid $80,000 this year. Jeff Consoletti is the producer of the event, a role he has held for several years. Other contractual labor expenses (the recipients are not identified) are $24,000 for the operations manager for the two and a half-day festival and $17,000 for the event production coordinator. CSW paid $12,500 to an “art and heritage” coordinator. The parade production manager was paid $14,000. CSW does not request proposals from competing outside contractors and generally works with the same ones year after year.

In addition to the $80,000 paid to Consoletti, CSW paid $20,000 to someone to book performers for the event and an additional $44,300 for other entertainment staff. Those contractors were not named in the financial statement.

Other consultants and their fees were Sam Borelli, who was paid $44,000. Borelli, who has served as a consultant to CSW in the past, helped secure sponsors for the event and is likely the recipient of some if not all of $18,000 in sponsor sales commissions listed in the profit and loss statement. Mike Stommel, who has handled publicity for the event in the past, was paid $37,000. And Karan Sharma, who was the sponsorship coordinator and production assistant, was paid $9,000.

The financial statement shows a payment of $5,000 for “government consulting,” which was budgeted at $12,000. That likely is the fee paid to Scott Schmidt, former campaign manager for and deputy to Mayor Lauren Meister, who has met with Meister and Councilmember John D’Amico about the community assessment of Pride that they organized. Schmidt recently ended his contract CSW, citing his concern about the perception of a conflict of interest given his relationship with Meister.

Fees for entertainers totaled $469,753, or 19% of overall expenses, with $4,550 spent on the transgender celebration, $45,925 on hip hop artists and hosts, $52,353 on Latin artists and hosts and $344,950 spent on more general entertainers and hosts.

The financial statement also shows that CSW, which has no full time staff, has spent $6,000 of a budgeted $13,500 to lease its small office at the Pacific Design Center and $30,731 to renovate the space. It spent an additional $4,230 for parking and office utilities and internet and telephone service.

The City of West Hollywood, which subsidizes the Pride event with roughly $500,000 in waived fees, foregone parking meter revenue and some cash, is holding another community meeting to discuss the direction LA Pride should take going forward. That meeting is on Aug. 17 at 6:30 p.m. at the auditorium in West Hollywood Park adjacent to the library.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
ADVERTISEMENT

23 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James F
James F
7 years ago

I was on the board of CSW for 16 years. I left the board about 2011 as I sensed that there were too many things happening that I felt weren’t right. Many having nothing to do with the finances. Just in the way I was treated by some of the executive board member, one in particular. Bottom line is that I felt it was enough of a struggle to handle the duties of the committee I chaired. I wasn’t getting the support I needed from some members of the executive board and i some cases I felt the one of… Read more »

Mike
Mike
7 years ago

I passed on the pride/parade this year due to the shootings in Florida and the news about the guy being arrested in SM with all kinds of guns in the trunk of his car. Moreover, I have grown bored with the whole Pride thing due to its commercialization. West Hollywood is not the Gay mecca that existed when I moved out here in 1978. There is a such thing as too much success. Personally, I have never worried about being “accepted” I just want to be left alone and not hassled for who I am.

SE
SE
7 years ago

The main criteria for a Pride festival/celebration should be inclusion and equality. When tickets prices are too expensive for one segment of the population and other segments are marginalized or excluded in order to increase profitability then we have lost our way. That is the true bottom line. There is only shame – not pride – in making members of the LGBT community once again feel they aren’t “enough” and CSW needs to make this the main consideration in every decision they make in the future.

Manny
Manny
7 years ago

The article that “Mimi” posted, aside from being too long and boring, has no reference or insight into the problems surrounding CSW and LA Pride in West Hollywood.

The article does makes arguments for and against the commercialization and corruption of the Gay Liberation Movement, but it offers no further discussion about the other plethora of issues that are specific to CSW……Which is what we should be discussing here.

J Simmons
J Simmons
7 years ago

I agree with the other rational minded. The Orlando Tragedy must have had a major impact, and going around pointing fingers THIS YEAR DUE TO A TRAGEDY, is disrespectful and shamefull.

Pride has and will go on FOR YEARS.

Point Fingers; Blame Whomever …. NEXT YEAR!

Arguing money and profits when so many innocent lives were so horrificly is just not right, not proper, not civilized, and just olain NOT HUMAN.

Josh Kurpies
Josh Kurpies
7 years ago

Mimi – Great “The Price of Gay Pride” article! Thank you for sharing!

Proud Supporter of LA PRIDE
Proud Supporter of LA PRIDE
7 years ago

Thank you @Mimi for posting the link to that article before I had a chance to. PRIDE has changed not just in LA but around the world. This should be something that everyone in the community is so excited about. “These events really switched from an overtly political stand to one that is more inclusive of lots of people, more embracing of a broader ‘Pride’ agenda — meaning, to feel good about being gay, rather than demanding change.” What was once a “march”, he adds, is now, tellingly, more widely referred to as a “parade”. Corporate sponsorship of the world’s… Read more »

Mimi
Mimi
7 years ago

I think the most important thing to point out is that PRIDE as an institution, as a rallying call for our community, is always EVOLVING. If you look at Pride events from New York City to Rwanda, they are meaningful but different than what many of us remember from the parades and events of the 1970’s. This great article talks at length about how Pride has evolved. I highly reccomend that you read it: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/228207c6-5f46-11e6-ae3f-77baadeb1c93.html?siteedition=intl

Jim Nasium
Jim Nasium
7 years ago

@Let’s Be Honest Here–yeah but weren’t the LED lights cool?

Torres
Torres
7 years ago

1.
DTLA Proud Festival was so much fun!
2.
I think LA Pride should move to a bigger venue like downtown and WeHo should create a new city run cozier production.

Let's Be Honest Here
Let's Be Honest Here
7 years ago

I’m going to have to rip the accountability and transparency issue reported by the key leaders of CSW to shreds here. It just doesn’t add up and those who run nonprofits correctly smell “bullcrap” all over this. There are too many Red Flags all over this reporting that should give pause to anyone who runs an organization. Let’s start with the public records available on Guidestar on CSW’s profit/losses and expenses for the last six years: 2011 – $11,071 profit $ 1,596,888 Income $1,575,817 Expenses 2012 – $70,526 loss $ 1,692,548 Income $1,763,074 Expenses 2013 – $76.566 loss $ 1,839,918… Read more »

Wayne
Wayne
7 years ago

i have attended and enjoyed the CSW Parade and Festival since the early 1980’s. My earliest vivid memories are from 1986. Then, the festival was held in the PDC parking lot when only the blue building existed. it was small, cozy and the attendance was much less than it is now. I remember a disco tent under a small white canopy. I remember porn stars in dunk tanks and other simple pleasures. I remember the parade being as spectacular as it is now. Over the years with under the leadership of a wide range of individuals and with the addition… Read more »